The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a couple of years ago they did a study an rct on women menopausal post-menopausal women so not an associational and they actually gave them uh i think taurine in such huge amounts that they got their tmao levels in their blood up an order of magnitude 10 times normal and maintained them for six months and they didn't show a single shimmer the slightest change in any cardiovascular lipids ratios or a range of inflammatory markers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.