Paul Saladino· MD
Would be interesting to see long term safety data at doses >3g per day.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Would be interesting to see long term safety data at doses >3g per day.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
In some studies doses >3g perform better than lower doses for glycemic reduction but it seems the jury is still out on optimal supplemental dosing.