The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as you know there's uh what 30% of the population has a te that's 800 or higher depending on their age right so it's a normal it's within the normal distribution yeah would I encourage someone to be higher than that no but if that's where they've tight rated their dose to be relieve their symptoms and and so forth I'm comfortable having the discussion with the patient and saying okay here's how you have a prostate cancer I think we can monitor and follow it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.