The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by the time I met her she was on a very clever regimen which was mostly estriol so topical estriol not estradiol and we can get into the details of that later along with she didn't need the progesterone obviously because sure she had hysterectomy and physiologic replacement of testosterone to reduce them sort of up to about half an anagram per deciliter level in her case
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
along with she didn't need the progesterone obviously because sure she had hysterectomy and physiologic replacement of testosterone to reduce them sort of up to about half an anagram per deciliter level in her case