The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the interesting question is does this help address some of the female use case so for example if one of the symptoms that a female is turning to testosterone for his libido does she really need to be on Mega doses of systemic testosterone Around the Clock versus you know in the same way a man would use Calis for an OnDemand Ed issue could a woman be using intranasal testosterone for an ond demand libido issue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
with a female with like a low testosterone taking a couple of shots of nesto didn't in the subsequent hours have much of an impact on libido
one of the most interesting ways that's being studied now is using um an FDA approved product it's not approved for this use so it's called nesto and it's a it's an intranasal testosterone spray that is FDA approved for male use for testosterone replacement therapy um but it's being used off label it's also being tested in a clinical trial for libido in women