The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we came away from this analysis with the belief that there was no evidence that exogenous testosterone application was increasing the risk of prostate cancer and there was actually some evidence that hypogonadism may not be increasing the incidence of um prostate cancer but may have increased the incidence of highgrade prostate cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
TRT and prostate cancer risk