The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we're not talking about physiologic Replacements of testosterone because the evidence is abundantly clear that we do not see any reduction in lifespan we don't see any increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease cancer uh or these other things but huge quality of life increases concomitantly so it really makes sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.