The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are broadly speaking two ways to think about this the first is a direct way to do it which is giving testosterone and this can be done in many formats uh the most common formats would be topical testosterone or injectable testosterone but there's also an intranasal formulation there are pellets that can provide sort of a slow release over a period of months
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are broadly speaking two ways to think about this the first is a direct way to do it which is giving testosterone and this can be done in many formats the most common formats would be topical testosterone or injectable testosterone but there's also an intranasal formulation there are pellets that can provide sort of a slow release over a period of months and then there are indirect ways to give testosterone which are basically tricks that mimic these hormones so uh the first of these is something called HCG and HCG is a mimetic of luteinizing hormone