Peter Attia· MD
because it is a hydrophobic molecule it basically makes its way into the cell easily it diffuses into the cell quite simply meaning it doesn't require a channel or a receptor on the cell membrane to make its way inside
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because it is a hydrophobic molecule it basically makes its way into the cell easily it diffuses into the cell quite simply meaning it doesn't require a channel or a receptor on the cell membrane to make its way inside
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.