Peter Attia· MD
look Mo you don't have to have it around if it's bound to the receptor and it's doing its work it doesn't have to physiologically be there all the time in the serum
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
look Mo you don't have to have it around if it's bound to the receptor and it's doing its work it doesn't have to physiologically be there all the time in the serum
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
essentially what happens is it has the fastest rapid on onset and then it declines
uh the test show I think has been out for at least six or seven years