Peter Attia· MD
we came away from this analysis with the belief that there was no evidence that exogenous testosterone application was increasing the risk of prostate cancer
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we came away from this analysis with the belief that there was no evidence that exogenous testosterone application was increasing the risk of prostate cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
contrary to popular belief testosterone replacement therapy does not increase the risk of prostate cancer