The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don't have a problem with a man being on TRT unless the full workup really wasn't done and really didn't uncover all the stones and say, "Okay, how much are you sleeping really? What's your micronutrient status? Do you have enough zinc?" >> Um what about your, you know, like what about all these factors? Are you overex exercising? How much caffeine are you using? Like it's all part of it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.