The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
for me if you're hypogonadal I want to maintain your cardiovascular health I want to maintain your bone health your muscle mass your cognitive function so I want to make you Yukon for an individual who has prostate cancer who has low tea um it really comes down to what how aggressive is their prostate cancer in terms of what I would advise them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I can't think of any scenarios where I really advise against uh trt for somebody who is symptomatic and and has um you know there's so many other you know potential negative outcomes for a patient who has low tea besides the possible development or or detection of a prostate cancer so for me if you're hypogonadal I want to maintain your cardiovascular health I want to maintain your bone health your muscle mass your cognitive function so I want to make you Yukon for an individual who has prostate cancer who has low tea um it really comes down to what how aggressive is their prostate cancer in terms of what I would advise them
I can't think of any scenarios where I really advise against U trt for somebody who is symptomatic and and has um you know there's so many other you know potential negative outcomes for a patient who has low te besides the possible development or or detection of a prostate cancer
for me if you're hypogonadal I want to maintain your cardiovascular health I want to maintain your bone health your muscle mass your cognitive function
You know, I I they're really safe drugs and I I like the my my effect is someone comes in who's young who maybe wants kids, hasn't had them, and they have a low testosterone of 220.
And we know that it's not increasing the risk of prostate cancer and heart disease and all the things we used to worry about outside of the edge case of hypertension which can be managed. But all of that said, is there a case to be made that we should not be replacing testosterone in men because um it turns us backwards in terms of this aggression and it's more likely to make that 55year-old guy want to find himself the 14, you know, the the 20year-old girlfriend.
medically it's a completely safe thing to replace. Um, and we know that there are great outcomes with respect to bone health, uh, with respect to, uh, frailty and subjective many subjective findings, right?