The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it makes its way into the cell and then it binds to an androgen receptor and this receptor is outside of the nucleus it undergoes this conformational change and it causes things called heat shock proteins to be dislocated they get transported into the cell and then something called the dimerization takes place
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it makes its way into the cell and then it binds to an androgen receptor and this receptor is outside of the nucleus it undergoes this conformational change and it causes things called heat shock proteins to be dislocated they get transported into the cell and then something called the dimerization takes place and that's just a fancy way of saying a new molecule is created by the [Music] fusion and it doesn't have to be covalent it can be non-covalent but the fusion of two molecules that look very much alike so this androgen receptor dimer now makes its way into the nucleus and and binds with um kind of something called a hormone response element and that's what actually turns on and off gene transcription