The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
do you think we're ever going to get to the point where um trt can be customizable based on a more Broad View where a patient comes to see you and you do an androgen receptor assay on them and you couple that with what their free tea is and make decisions based on that as opposed to just sort of flying a little bit blind and having to guess that would be amazing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The second thing which would not be nearly as important would be I would love to have an assay to measure androgen receptor density.