We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
I think the worst thing you can do is give 200 Mig IM every 2 weeks that that doesn't make a lot of sense to me and you and the drug will last about 10 days so for about four days you're not even having any medication on board but you have a high erythrocytosis rate because it's the spiking that causes that erythrocytosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The standard dose was 200 milligrams every two weeks and um which immediately I I was actually I remember going through Llewellyn's pharmarmacology and looking at the pharmaccoinetics and being like this is an awful idea.
The standard was 200 Mig every two weeks um which immediately I I was actually I remember going through lewellen's pharmacology and looking at the pharmacokinetics and being like this is an awful idea
10 years ago everyone I saw that was prescribing this was prescribing the standard was 200 milligrams every two weeks which was crazy highest risk.