The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was one point in time actually and this I know may be tangential but interesting my total cholesterol at one point in time was 88 and that's because I was uh eating pamin which bind the tannins bind the bile acids and then I also a lot of the fat in my diet was coming from macadamia nuts and beef fat which skewed me towards mostly monounsaturated fats which do tend to lower cholesterol values
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.