The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the second bout when i had the reverse t3 problem and by the way i still didn't know after the first bout when i corrected with ndt i was still doing the old paradigm i still didn't know about primal paleo and i didn't i still didn't know so then i get to my reverse t3 problem i solve it with t3 but now my body's still fat and inflamed that's when i was pre-diabetic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.