Peter Attia· MD
it's not even really clear how we evaluate you know what is better and what is sub-optimal it may depend on what your what your endpoint is what you're actually interested in optimizing
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
it's not even really clear how we evaluate you know what is better and what is sub-optimal it may depend on what your what your endpoint is what you're actually interested in optimizing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.