The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the subjects are unaware that they all got the exact same amount of relatively low nicotine containing vape pen so they they basically and they're measuring it from their bloodstream so they all have fairly low levels of nicotine but one group was told you got a lot one group was told you got a medium amount and the other was told you got a little bit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.