The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you have to deal with some epigenetic change in response to a glucose but man it's so unfair but in the end it shows you that we had a very superficial understanding of diabetes complications years ago and again now there's a whole rich field that's devoted to this idea of these windows of hyperglycemia permanently altering these important cells that ultimately contribute to diabetes complications
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.