The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think that's the proper paradigm to look this for a type 2 diabetic they have carbohydrate poisoning that's what they have and when you get rid of the poison out of their system and they're no longer a type 2 diabetic I think it's perfectly reasonable to say you've cured their type 2 diabetes just like I cured your mercury poisoning by not poisoning you anymore and I think that's the proper paradigm
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.