The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they spent over a hundred million dollars for a relatively small number of patients hundred million dollars for 1400 patients over seven years yeah that's a staggering sum of money where did it go I mean I know not being critical of that I'm just saying like what was so expensive about that study coordinating centers and you know buying people's time to be able to care for them to call them cajole them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.