The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
prior to Banting and best what happened to children with type 1 diabetes children or or adult or adults so at least in the 19th century nothing so these people would present with weight loss and history drinking and and urinating quite a bit and over time they had to manage their expectations and then they would expire and it was I assume usually from complications of diabetic ketoacidosis yeah and so it would happen in a matter of weeks some cases days in some cases months
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.