Paul Saladino· MD
we don't see elevated fasting glucose levels um any evidence of type 2 diabetes or anything like that
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we don't see elevated fasting glucose levels um any evidence of type 2 diabetes or anything like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
incredibly i mean this is one of the reasons that it's so fun to work with them and so because you know you think you're we're seeing something really important which is that these folks that don't have any access to modern medicine but are really active and eating you know whole food diets you know are incredibly healthy they don't have high blood pressure um you know we've measured blood pressures and hundreds of pods of men and women and i can count on one hand the number that are you know above the 140 cut off for you know look for grade one what used to be called low grade one hypertension um we don't see elevated fasting glucose levels um any evidence of type 2 diabetes anything like that i mean we have bmis now on people you know body weights on people for their whole adult lives basically from when they're in their early 20s so when they're well their whole lives because they live in their 60s and 70s we have people from their 20s through their 50s um and no change in body weight so they're not like gradually becoming obese like we do here on average in the us