The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
carbohydrates do not cause diabetes even glucose even sucrose does not cause diabetes there are studies from the 60s and 70s in which 85 percent carbohydrate diets were given to patients with diabetes and they saw improvements in metabolic function in fact the diabetes was reversed over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.