The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Where I do think it is useful is tracking personal progress. You know, if you are getting a new A1C test every 6 months, 3 months, 1 year, and it was 10% 2 years ago, and then you got it down to 8, and then you got it down to 6, that's meaningful progress. It tells you a trend.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.