Paul Saladino· MD
I posted stuff on Instagram about diabetes how many people in ICUs had diabetes at one ICU it was an N of 1 or was an out of 15 but 14 of them had diabetes or prediabetes is crazy
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I posted stuff on Instagram about diabetes how many people in ICUs had diabetes at one ICU it was an N of 1 or was an out of 15 but 14 of them had diabetes or prediabetes is crazy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in his ICU there were 15 patients on ventilators and 14 of them had diabetes or prediabetes and the last one was a 94 year old man who they had not tested for this so in his ICU 90 plus percent you know 93 94 percent of people had pre-diabetes or diabetes