The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
ugali as much as we wanted to hate the ugali and see the ugali as the spawn of satan it didn't appear to be creating massive amounts of metabolic health is it as nutrient dense as an animal i don't think it is it's not it's not a kudu liver but it is calories and it doesn't seem to create rampant or immediate diabetes in these people
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.