The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the weapon of mass destruction for blood sugar is liquid sugar — you know a kid in a 20 ounce can of bottle of coke is getting as much sugar and faster weight of their bloodstream than they had in an entire year 150 years ago like like we're we're absolutely just nuking our child's bloodstream with those liquid sugar particularly fructose
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.