Paul Saladino· MD
And from traditional, you know, guidelines diagnosing diagnosing diabetes, they look at that 2-hour glucose mark after you've drinking this glucose sugary solution, and they want to see your glucose below 140 at 2 hours.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And from traditional, you know, guidelines diagnosing diagnosing diabetes, they look at that 2-hour glucose mark after you've drinking this glucose sugary solution, and they want to see your glucose below 140 at 2 hours.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.