The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you take that away does that risk risk still exist it's much harder to figure that out because there are just far fewer people to research and and try and answer that question so — um again if you look at so if we go back to the Oblivion semen a — if you look at they have a they have a zero percent risk of type 2 diabetes like nobody has diabetes in in that population — and they've looked at that so in that setting again we see apple E4 maybe not associated with risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.