The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but it can just be that you need a higher amount of glucose to achieve that same balance of production and consumption in the diabetic and that reflects often in my opinion at least you know underlying issues with how fat is handled that you either need more glucose to induce more insulin in order to suppress lipolysis in the diabetic okay or more glucose to out compete fat to get burnt in tissues
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.