Peter Attia· MD
By comparison, the effect size here is 1.05x. That's what a 5% relative risk increase is. So this is smaller than associations that have been reported for many other things that we actually know are probably almost assuredly not causal um based on more wellto-do data such as the association between red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes which is a 1.10 or a 10% relative risk increase per 100 gram per day increase in red meat. Of course, we've argued at nauseium that those associations are almost assuredly picking up a confounder which is healthy user bias uh or even poultry consumption in the risk of type 2 diabetes 1.08. Again, both of these are stronger associations here.