The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the the time frame for that to happen is over a period of several weeks so if the blood sugar goes up it may there may be a lag of a month or two before the vision changes and when the blood sugar goes down same thing it takes weeks for that to kind of go back to normal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because glucose can diffuse into the lens cause it to swell and that will change the shape of the lens the lens becomes physically bigger so it's like a thicker more powerful lens so it's an osmotic change correct