Peter Attia· MD
so they're both manifestations of the same thing they're both manifestations of hyperinsulinemia and that explains why it's not two defects of type-2 diabetes it's actually a single defect
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so they're both manifestations of the same thing they're both manifestations of hyperinsulinemia and that explains why it's not two defects of type-2 diabetes it's actually a single defect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this is what I mean that's why I like the physics model which is like okay we have a theory now which now fits them the facts so much better than the old lock and key model
if you think about the sort of overflow paradigm again explains this paradox very easily because what happens is that and this is where you know if you look at a lot of the work on the twin cycles hypothesis fits in is that you're filling up your liver with all this glucose hyperinsulinemia you've got too much glucose in your liver your liver starts making fat and pumping it out then one of the organs that it accumulates in is the pancreas so now you've got fatty pancreas