The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and not and talking about the rest of the body which has connected to the brain the fact that my sister as AE a neck surgeon was was reprimanded by doctors for looking at the charts and asking whether the diabetes the patient inevitably had when they had sinus infections could be related to the inflammation causing the sinus infection
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.