Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
what about type 1 diabetes where there still seems to be an increased risk and that's especially concerning for young people exactly I don't know that and of course that's gonna be overlaid with obesity so then you're gonna have both issues operating at the same time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even understanding for certain what got us into this situation with underlying comorbidities I mean I'd like to understand more why do certain comorbidities actually predispose you to a bad outcome what is it about that
what do you think for example in I mean type 2 diabetes makes a bit more sense but what about type 1 diabetes where there still seems to be an increased risk and that's especially concerning for young people exactly I don't know that and of course that's gonna be overlaid with obesity so then you're gonna have both issues operating at the same time how much of that is compromised lung capacity how much wood is actually the diabetes that's what's really unclear