The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if for instance I take a kid who has type 1 diabetes and we have stable insulin doses and then they go on like a ski vacation with their parents and the kids are you know mostly playing video games and hanging out and then they go off to Vail and they ski for six hours a day those kids can can require non-stop carbohydrates until their parents figure out that they have a problem and then they end up on insulin doses that are reduced by two-thirds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.