The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a small but double-blinded randomized clinical trial it demonstrated a 0.6 percent meaning 0.6 absolute percentage Point reduction in hemoglobin A1c in people with type 2 diabetes that's that and that was only in 90 days which is pretty interesting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it also uh was was um associated with um or I would say more than associated with it demonstrated and caused about a 30 reduction in postprandial glucose AUC area under the curve so meaning when you gave people a glucose Challenge and then measured and plotted a graph of their glucose response and look at the area under that curve the people who had been taking this pendulum glucose control probiotic had a 30 reduction in that meaning they had become more insulin sensitive