The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so is there any sense and I know you didn't do this in the study because you said it was only 90 days but is there any plan to redo this to find out what happens if they had stayed on for a year in other words could you take someone with type two diabetes and actually knock you know 1.2% off their hemoglobin A1c which for many people would now take them straight out of the diabetic range
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.