The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
metabolic disorders you know most people think of metabolic disorders as obesity diabetes and cardiovascular disease there are definitely people who lump some other diseases in that model but mainstream medicine doesn't but some people put cancer into that group some people put Alzheimer's into that group and that's the evidence for that is increasing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
until proven otherwise when you see a bi-directional relationship like that you have to assume they are somehow connected
and the really interesting thing is that they are bi-directional relationships and that is a unique thing when you're looking at correlations