The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the lifetime risk it's like double that or maybe even more i can't remember what the exact figure is but it's like mind-blowing the number of people who will at some point in their life develop type 2 diabetes in the u.s
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i would completely agree that their lifetime risk is probably at least one in five of having type 2 diabetes