Paul Saladino· MD
well this is mostly type 2 diabetes all of these numbers since 1960 are i think type 2 diabetes whereas the 1935 was not but around 90 to 95 percent of diabetes today is type 2
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well this is mostly type 2 diabetes all of these numbers since 1960 are i think type 2 diabetes whereas the 1935 was not but around 90 to 95 percent of diabetes today is type 2
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.