The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
at that point they don't present with the classical signs and symptoms it's really incredibly aggressive they look like they have gastroenteritis and weight loss and if nobody bothers to check a serum glucose you might never know that they in fact have life-threatening diabetic ketoacidosis and new onset type 1 diabetes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we know for a fact that some infants that are diagnosed now with new onset diabetes would have been the kids who you thought had died of sepsis back when you were in medical school so we have a greater awareness that this that this autoimmunity can happen to kids as early as five or six months of life