The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the social and psychological consequences in humans that are just different than we have in mice right the the growth hormone deficient mice aren't going to be subject well they might be probably not subject to the same social pressures that somebody you know has very low growth hormone signaling in people is subjected to which may contribute to other other things later on like alcoholism
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.