The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a good friend of ours George Martin who died a couple of years ago once went through and cataloged all the human diseases he could and tried to look at the similarities of their phenotypic changes relative to what happens with normal aging he came up with diabetes as having the most similarities to accelerated aging of any of the groups that he looked at
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.