The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This might be actually one of the ones where I would say unlike in the rapid trial, you actually want to come up with primary outcomes that are quite different here. This is where uh for example, I'd want to see fat oxidation. Yeah. I'd want to see, you know, what we talk about as zone 2 efficiency. I mean, if this is indeed improving mitochondrial function, I I'm not aware of a better test of mitochondrial function.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.