The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i wish that most of this epidemiology were then followed up with interventional studies that's what we really need we need more interventional studies to test whether the inclusion of vegetables in the human diet is actually beneficial for humans or not we need more interventional studies to test whether meat is beneficial or harmful for humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are some studies that show food is beneficial some studies that show that fruit and vegetable intervention does nothing for humans and that there isn't really in my opinion perhaps you will disagree with me a clear evidence in the literature that vegetables are so beneficial for humans