The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is a wide inter-individual variability for the lowest intake required to elicit toxicity possibilities include reduced micron clearance vitamin a increased intestinal absorption of vitamin a and other nutritional factors such as zinc deficiency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in some individuals perhaps individuals who are zinc deficient maybe they're eating 25 000 iu of vitamin a per day in the form of a supplement and they're not eating enough animal foods and they're zinc deficient or they're not getting enough vitamin d because they're not outside inter-individual variation may result in toxicity at that level over years